No.
The audience is aging, and the format lacks that broad market appeal. The next generation is so addicted to their phones that it is hard to pull them away from a screen to sit down and enjoy a game like we once did.
The only way D&D survives is as a name on a mobile phone game.
5E survives, but not as a live-service game. Wizards will keep putting out new versions of D&D, such as the upcoming 6E, and quite likely 7E, and 5E support will be sunsetted since a live-service model has "end of life" support built into the game as a feature. They will not pay to keep 5E support going once they need you to "move on."
5E will be well supported by third parties and the community, which is why Tales of the Valiant remains relevant. That will continue past the official support of D&D 5E and 5.5E and be "the only 5E" outside of finding books and playing it by hand, or on a VTT that still supports it, but even they will be pressured to move on.
Tales of the Valiant will likely be the last major and supported version of 5E ever written. It is a solid game, I still like it, but I have no room on my shelves for it. I do not play it as much as my other fantasy tentpoles, like BX, C&C, GURPS Fantasy, and DCC. It still has a massive problem with character sheet length, which slows play and hurts the game. I doubt any version of 5E, outside of Nimble, fixes this core flaw in the system.
If it takes me 3-5 minutes to flip through my character sheet to decide what I am going to do on a turn, that is a massive problem with the game. Some people take as long as 30 minutes. Character sheet length and choice paralysis will be what kills 5E, and what 6E will be "marketed" as solving, before, of course, they break it again because they now have "room to expand the game" and "we have returned tactical player choice to 6.5E."
And sort of the weak reaction to ToV and other major 5E variants means D&D will be the gold standard, and that also seals the fate of the game when live service support is eventually dropped. More should get on the ToV train and support this game, as it means the 5E rules will have a life past the D&D 6E launch day, and the loud din of voices tells us to "upgrade or be left behind."
Old School Essentials is the hot game right now, taking the torch of BX support and standardization across the hobby. This is compatible with everything: light, fast, simple, and fun. This, plus games in the Without Number series of books, can last you a lifetime of fun across any genre you can imagine.
GURPS, once you know the system, plays faster than 5E. That one-second turn does not allow much wiggle room. The character sheets are easier, too.
DCC is the more fun game, with each class constructed to provide fun choices during a turn, with all the junk cut off and tossed out.
Shadowdark, I don't consider 5E, as it is more of a tweener game between 5E and OSE. It is closer to OSE and BX in feel, and while it uses 5E mechanics, it is an OSR-variant game.
C&C is the closest thing I have to a 5E replacement, in the modern rules and 3.5E variant play, with broad compatibility with every BX and 1E adventure.
D&D will be the thing that kills 5E when they move on to 6E, and the announcement of that feels really close. The best hope is to support the community games and continue that legacy and Open 5E rules support. The real light here is Open 5E, and the community ultimately supported the game. I do see potential for an OSE-style version of 5E that simplifies the game while staying math-compatible, streamlines character sheets, and provides a simple experience that remains compatible with 5E adventures. Nimble is the first game of its kind in this genre, and there will be others.
There will be a major OSR-style game that is 5E compatible, keeps the 5E math, yet feels and plays like a traditional OSR game. Shadowdark is close, but not entirely there. There is nothing in this niche now, and it will come. This is probably one of the best hopes for 5E going forward: an OSR system that adopts the math but simplifies play.
My money is on ToV, since they have the best support and community model. As for the other alternative, Level Up A5E, I am still a fan, but it is a niche game that needs an update. The character creation support is also lacking, and doing a character by hand takes me 90 minutes, which is unforgivable when I just want to play. A5E is still a solid, well-built system, but it is an older game that not many know about.
Level Up A5E is the type of game that will sit around in a box in my garage for years, and I will end up sticking with it in the end, since this is the one I always liked the best out of all of them. Design matters. Fixing the inherent problems of 5E matters more than compatibility. Making the game lethal and serious gives the game teeth. While ToV has more books and stuff, Level Up is a smaller game (a bonus) and has far better design. They were not afraid to break compatibility to solve the system's problems.
Level Up A5E may win the "who survives 5E" question for me, after all is said and done. While ToV has the best compatibility among all versions of Open 5E, I have to ask: Is compatibility with a system that offers me little more than a patched 2014 version what I want? Or is a redesigned version of the core game built around the core pillars of play a better deal in the long term?
A5E is still the better game than D&D 2014 (which it directly fixes), ToV (which is a patched 2014), and even D&D 2024 (which A5E eliminates the need for). Design-wise, A5E is still far ahead of the others, since it rebuilds the core to fix the system's flaws. Yes, it is the oldest Open 5E game, but 5E's problems were known a decade ago, and this game fixes almost all of them.
So, to answer the question again?
Yes.
5E does have a future.
The answer depends on your perspective, needs, and whether you are bought into the live-service model of play. It also depends on your willingness to try new things.
No comments:
Post a Comment