A Brush with Disaster

I had an issue where I nearly had to evacuate the house last night. So I got my clothes, computer, and other necessary things packed and ready to go. Thankfully, it turned out to be nothing but a big nothing, but it was scary. All is well, and I unpacked, having survived a brush with disaster.

But my 2d6 games were in my travel bags, again. If I were to "lose it all," then my 2d6 games would be the bridge that gets me through. I wanted GURPS, but I would need to have a bag ready with GURPS, since there were way too many choices to make when throwing things in a travel bag and packing in a panic. The 2d6 games? In a small mini-tablet bag, and still ready to go.

The biggest advantage of 2d6 games over GURPS and even 5E is that no software is needed to play, and all you need are commonly available six-sided dice. I should be hauling GURPS and possibly OSRIC 3.0 along, but the 2d6 games are just enough for an emergency, given my state of mind. The polyhedral dice set would need to be pre-packed, since sorting and choosing one in an emergency would take too much time. That is easy enough, but I always have six-siders in my travel bags.

Not needing access to computers or character design software clearly gives you an advantage when carrying around a simpler, fast-playing, no-software-needed game. My 2d6 games fit that role, and OSRIC 3.0 also does. Shadowdark would also work. OSRIC would be a bigger, heavier book, but you can get a lifetime of gaming out of that. With GURPS, all you need is the two core books, but needing software puts the game at a disadvantage for portability.

OSRIC 3.0 is brought up here because it is a self-contained, complete implementation of the original 1E rules and the best version of the greatest role-playing game ever made. The PoD book from DriveThru is a single, softcover volume that would travel well, but be a little bulky. It replaces all of 5E and every OSR game ever written, so there is a value to choosing that game as my champion to grab when I am rushing out of the door and into oblivion.

GURPS is far more compelling to me as well, so there is that to consider. Two books for any genre imaginable is a strong prospect, and that promise still holds up. I still need software to play this, so that adds a computer, Internet access, and power requirement into the equation. Arguably, OSRIC is far better with printed character sheets as well, to keep all the numbers straight. The 2d6 games beat them both in not needing much of anything in terms of character sheets or software.

Remember to pack pens, pencils, erasers, dice, a ruler, and a small journal notebook or two! You can grab the books, but you still will not be able to play without the basics. It is best to pre-pack these sorts of things and leave them in your bug-out bag.

The thing that keeps those 2d6 games in my "grab and go" bags is genre support. FTL Nomad and Sword of Cepheus 2nd Edition have tons of tables, charts, world and universe creation systems, encounter tables, and lists of stuff to keep me busy for a good, long time when my mind is in a panic and not thinking straight. With a game like GURPS, I still need to "design it all myself," and with my brain not working correctly due to panic, that's much harder. With the 2d6 games, I can turn my brain off, create a character, and have random chart adventures while I sit in that hotel room trying not to think about home. Even OSRIC fails that test; where the 2d6 games shine is that they are portable "mini-games" and entire universes and adventure-creation engines in a small book.

What a night.

Well, disaster averted, but a few truths were revealed as I rushed to leave behind a history of gaming and had thoughts of seeing it all burn.

What I chose to be left with are my truths.

I can play these 2d6 games with the stationery they supply in the hotel room, and I do not need access to a printer, my library, the Internet, or anything else. And the bags are as big as my iPad Mini, and that travels with them.

Losing Touch With Reality

My SCA experience changed me.

The one thing "doing it all for real" highlights is how utterly childish and fantasy-land D&D and many of these fantasy games have become. We have talking frogs, bear people, planar magics, every class with infinite-use video-game blaster powers, glowing magic coming out of our hands, impossible weapons, combat tactics that would get you killed in the real world, death is impossible, and being able to sleep a night's rest and heal off a shotgun blast to the face.

Today's tabletop role-playing games have turned so silly and childish that I can't really call them games anymore, because part of the definition of the game is "there needs to be winners and losers."

And all of these games tell you outright, "everyone wins."

In Tomb of Horrors? Your character dies, you lose. Just like it was in AD&D. We started to go off the rails with the "too heroic" AD&D 2nd Edition, and the railroad "novel adventures" that defined that game and era, and eventually led to bankruptcy.

Since then, D&D has been defined by two of the most toxic forces in gaming: the MMO and the mobile game. Both of these gaming models turn loneliness and FOMO into profit, and those are harmful to our well-being and mental health.

Bits, bytes, MMOs, and having your face stuck in the digital coffin of a phone mean you will die lonely and alone. You will not have a life. They engineer these games this way because they know that if they provide a "fake answer" to the problems they create, they can monetize the solution.

I found an escape. The SCA. A real place with real people, and no phones. Playing pretend, but doing it for real. No gaming, just the reality of trying to do this all ourselves.

Granted, if you "find a D&D group" that is also an escape, but in the post-COVID era, it is very hard since so much has moved online, and Wizards is turning D&D into a "digital first" experience. The era of the local game store and finding people to play with is ending. Those stores, face-to-face groups, and places will slowly die off like the Detroit automobile. Wizards will kill them all in the search for profits. The character sheets, chat rooms, and best place to find a game will be in the connected graveyard of D&D Beyond, where face-to-face interactions go to die.

D&D (and 5E) is designed to require a heavy backend support model to play. This isn't like AD&D, where you could play on a sheet of school notebook paper. You need thousands of hours of software and web development to ship character sheets, storage services, online systems, portals, websites, backend servers, and support teams just to run a character sheet.

What is this?

It is corporate D&D.

Paid subscriptions required.

5E can't really be played alone, and the model pushes you online. The game is designed to slowly strip away your connection to reality, with too much of the fantastic and not enough to keep it grounded. D&D isn't even fantasy, the Middle Ages, or the Renaissance anymore; any connection to history has gone through a messy divorce, with the original creators called terrible things. Those sins caused the game to lose touch with what it was, and today it joins the rest of "fantasy slop" that World of Warcraft, mobile games, and Wall Street push on us like "the next Fortnite."

I need my fantasy games to connect to history and reality. Sorry, that is non-negotiable. The fantastic isn't special anymore when it is commonplace. The planar multiverse sucks and is just a writer's cop-out for not wanting to put in the work or learn the lore. I will gladly pay the company that has a writing and creation staff that cares about the lore, rather than these outfits that "hire anyone out of college" and tell them, "do whatever you want."

Sorry, lazy Wall Street holding company, not good enough, no money for you. I couldn't care less about you being a way to pay people in your college clique. Care about the lore, because the "old school players" will be the first you come crawling back to when your new edition fails. And we will be the first ones kicked out the door when you get popular.

We'd better get something from it.

I like ToV and the 5E I built.

It is still inferior to the game and connection to reality and history that we had.

History and tradition matter more than the next big popular "mobile game thing."

Wall Street has that backward, and it will never, ever change.

Society for Creative Anachronism

I attended an event put on by the Society for Creative Anachronism (SCA) the other day, at a friend's invitation, and I joined the next day. The SCA is a legendary organization, dedicated to period recreations of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. It is an amazing group of people, dedicated to their crafts, and just an amazing experience to take part in.

But be forewarned, you get out of this what you put into it.

And this is 100% diametrically opposed to roleplaying. While I bet many of their members roleplay, what they do at the events IS THE REAL THING. You are not pretending to be a medieval knight; you are putting on armor, fighting with padded swords, and actually being one. You are not showing up at events and playing D&D, either, since that did not exist in this time period.

You do not roll dice here and play pretend.

You actually do the thing.

Be it arts and crafts, scroll making, being a knight, archery, fencing, cooking, clothier, musician, or any other occupation or craft they did in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, you actually learn and DO THE THING.

You are not pretending to be a dragon boy, wearing a fur suit, putting on pointed elf ears, wearing cosplay Tiefling horns, or swinging around a prosthetic tail; you are taking on the role of a person who "could have existed" in the time, with the skills used during the time, and you participate in the events, battles, court, and other games and ceremonies.

You can't play a wizard, warlock, or other make-believe thing here - if it was real and existed in the world at the time, that is what you do.

D&D and many other fantasy games have this tendency to slip into areas harmful to mental illness. They are far too pretend and make-believe, and they lose touch with reality. Everyone has magic, every place is planar, every modern convenience has a fantasy equivalent, every race is a special magical animal or planar being, and you get into this one-upmanship and insane power curve that just reeks of childish "nuh-uh, I am more powerful than Godzilla" sort of "my pretend character is better than you."

In modern games can suck, you can have a number on your character sheet and magically not suck. You can walk around, say "my father is Odin, so I can..." and tell people how you do stupid, impossible things.

In the SCA, if you can't bead, craft, cook, sew, or do something of value, you suck, and no number on a character sheet will say otherwise. Spend time, learn, get better at the real skill in the real world, maybe make some money with the skill you have now - and NOT SUCK.

And you can't say you are Merlin, Gandalf, or some real-world historical figure.

You are who you are, and you do the real thing.

Guess what, if you spend 100 hours "learning the thing" on the character sheet, and have that skill, that is 100 fewer hours of playing pretend and learning a real trade or craft. You get the satisfaction of learning how to fire and glaze clay pottery or figurines. You get the skill to know how to sew period clothing, sing, or play music. You get the skill in melee fighting.

You get to do the things.

And you never pretend to, using dice and numbers on a sheet to cheat at real life.

And not one person at the event I went to yesterday had their face locked to a phone. They were all pretending to be "the persona they adopted," and since phones were never available at the time, nobody got them out, nobody used them during the event (except to take pictures), and nobody was locked into death-scrolling and ignoring the world around them. There were hundreds of people, dressed in period clothing, all speaking face-to-face, none of them on phones, and I felt like I was back in the 1980s.

While these games are fun hobbies, never, ever pretend they are a replacement for the real thing. Again, I am sure many members enjoy historical role-playing games, but none of them hold a candle to actually going out and doing it for real. Until you are there, doing it, at an event, you just don't know.

It was an amazing day.

And it made me see how modern "role-playing games" have lost touch with reality.

Tales & Battlezoo = My D&D

There is an innocence and clean implementation of Tales of the Valiant that I really appreciate. This is the best "generic 5E" you can get, and unlike D&D, I don't have to keep telling myself excuses to justify playing the game, despite all its baggage from Wizards.

I grew tired of the constant virtue signaling in the art, the absolute disaster of the OGL, them telling an entire group of players they could not leave fast enough, and all the terrible, negative, hurtful things they did over the years. The warning labels on the older books were like those on cigarette cartons. The disrespect thrown at the game's original creators.

There comes a point where you prove the company is unworthy of carrying the legacy forward, and Wizards has done that over and over again. And I don't really trust "the new guy" since these people come and go every few years. I saw this with the D&D 3E, 3.5E, 4E, 5E, and 5.5E teams and creators. Nobody stays at Wizards for long. In a few years, it will likely all be run by AI anyway.

Tales of the Valiant has a no-AI pledge, and the company needs this game to be their lifeline should 5E get dumped into the dustbin of history by Wizards, and make no mistake, that day is coming. They say 5E is evergreen, but history proves that a new team will make something new, and that will be the next, new, official thing.

The 5E "platform", just like the Linux "platform", is a solid, workable, good system. Just like there are some Linux vendors I can't stand, there are some 5E vendors I refuse to work with. One of them is Wizards, despite my memories, nostalgia, and history. I support the 5E platform, not D&D.

ToV was written as a beginner's game, and it was criticized for offering only two subclass choices per class; this was later addressed in the Player's Guide 2. Then again, for a beginner's game, I only want two subclass choices per class instead of D&D's four per class. The book gets too big for new players to grasp; there are too many choices, and those entering the hobby will walk away with choice paralysis.

Two clear choices are better than four for a starter game, and the ToV ones are very clear, offering "A or B" choices that support new players, and don't leave me feeling "did I make the wrong choice?"

ToV feels like old-school Labyrinth Lord back in the day. The "no baggage" and "clean support" version of BX that introduced me to the OSR. I have my original BX books, but I still chose LL over that. LL had the support, community, and love of its creator to drive interest. There is no "product identity" in here lying in wait as a trap, so I can't share content; if it is in the Black Flag SRD, it is pretty widely supported everywhere.

ToV's designs are close to the original 2014 standards, and all the "roleplay" powers are bept intact. A clear example is the ranger. The D&D 2024 version of the ranger feels like a combat-only class that focuses more on tactical battles, and the nature and roleplay powers were stripped out, likely because they were harder to support in a (now defunct) VTT.

Tales of the Valiant's ranger preserves the nature skills and abilities, and it aligns closely with my ideas of what the "5E ranger" is all about. I want a design closer to 2014 than Tasha's or 2024, and ToV hits that nail on the head. ToV keeps the best parts of the game, fixes all the problems, and creates a "clean room" version of 5E that can be supported forever.

D&D 2024 will only last as long as it takes Wizards to pump out a new version of D&D, and the life left in 5E as "the D&D system" is on a short clock. If the 2024 version failed, it would trigger the official D&D 5E support's sunset phase.

I would rather have a system that will be around a long time. And that is Tales of the Valiant.

The Battlezoo books complement the game perfectly, adding all sorts of all-ages fun while preserving the innocence of the core game. These are my "expansion books" that fill in a bunch of thematic gaps, and add a wealth of new options for dragons, monster training, and a rich assortment of other backgrounds to play.

If I am going to invest in a Battlezoo campaign and the hardcovers, I am going to invest in a 5E system that won't be replaced a few years down the road.

And there are all sorts of fun things to play here, and so many adventures to be had with all of these wonderful books. The Roll for Combat team "gets it," and they keep their books family-friendly while overdelivering value and creativity. These are fun books meant to engage your imagination, 5E system-neutral, and highly compelling, delivering enjoyment.

If I wanted to play a dragon, I could play a dragon.

Instead of promising adventure and delivering virtue signaling, these books expand what is possible and deliver amazing potential and infinite stories. They stay out of politics. They stay out of the online culture wars. I want an escape from this world, and they deliver.

ToV does the same; it doesn't insult old-school players by removing orcs and goblins from the bestiary. If I want them, they are there, just like they were in 2014 D&D. Nobody is making that choice for me; I make it. D&D 2024 feels the need to make these choices for us, and it rubs me the wrong way, like the designers are making a value judgment on me and how I play, and that is no place for them to be.

Sometimes the best thing a designer can do is stay out of my game.

But these days, I only want positive influences and happy games that don't trigger hurtful feelings or memories. I don't want to see the war on the Internet all over the pages of a game I use to escape it. I want something suitable for everybody, without hidden sex coding or demon fetishes all over the art.

If I want mature concepts or the sensitive topic of devil worship, I will add them myself. My choice: stay out of it, agenda-driven design team. A family-friendly game that avoids prejudging old-school players gives me the room to make that choice.

All of this works together so well, and the Battlezoo books are the last reason I keep 5E around on my game table. Highly engaging and worth the money.

There's No "Saving" D&D - It Is What It Is

Modern D&D has become a "platform" like Steam or Xbox; there is no going back to "what it was." Any attempt to do so will force platform customers to another product, the also-ran versions of 5E like Level Up, Nimble, Shadowdark, and Tales of the Valiant. It would not surprise me if Goodman Games isn't making its own version of Zocchi-dice 5E they can support, while also remaining compatible with "platform 5E."

At this point, everyone is making 5E. Give a company enough time and a catalog of adventures they need to support and sell, and they will make their own version of 5E. This is "Kobold's Law," and it is an accepted fact. I eagerly await DCC 5E and can't wait to see what they come up with.

Long live 5E.

D&D is just a name, but 5E is the platform.

The platform is more important than the game.

Wizards going on a nostalgia tour with Luke Gygax is the equivalent of an 80s hair metal band touring with an aging line-up. Yes, I love the artist and the skill, but D&D was replaced by 5E a long time ago, and people have moved on. Even if your books still say "D&D," it does not really matter; you could be playing any other 5E and still be in the 5E market.

Whenever D&D gets in trouble, they roll out Greyhawk and eventually replace it with the Realms a few years later. I can sing these oldies by memory at this point, guys.

Not to mention the OSR holding the ground of every previous edition. I have my "vision of D&D" over there, made by amazing creators who don't answer to shareholders who only care about stock price; they answer to players who choose their game out of love of the hobby and appreciation for the support.

Castles & Crusades.

Dungeon Crawl Classics.

Old School Essentials.

Swords & Wizardry.

OSRIC 3.0.

Adventures Dark & Deep.

Those are more D&D to me than D&D.

The last group of D&D creators built D&D 5.5E, a house that fell in on itself. Few bought, and most still play 5E. Creating a 6E is just going to create "another version Wizards has to support" and not solve the problem of the company being out of touch with the market. Wizards should have gotten out of the "edition creation game" long ago, and any more work splitting the market is going to bog the company down even more.

We do not need a 6E.

If they were honest, they would reprint AD&D, word-for-word, no sensitivity readers involved, no warning stickers like the game was a pack of cigarettes, and let the best game ever written stay in print. AD&D is like Tolkien now, please accept reality.

Stop making new editions in an era where few have the money to buy new books.

AD&D is 6E.

5E is your consumerist D&D platform, with or without you.

The market supports it.

This is where the game is now.

FTL Nomad: Winning Me Over

FTL Nomad is slowly winning me over as my science fiction game of choice. It is fast, fun, stays out of the way, has tons of options, and has a universal Xd6 dice mechanic where the only modifier is your skill level. And there are no attributes, just skills. The modifiers are minimal (skill only); this is an advantage/disadvantage multi-die system like 5E, with only one target number of 8+.

This is rules-light 2d6 gaming, but it doesn't feel rules-light.

It is just enough game without going so light that it feels inconsequential or too light to care about. There are a few systems that feel throw-away, like they don't have enough genre support or tooling that, once you start playing, you wish you were playing something else. And that something else is usually so full-featured and heavy that getting started is a massive effort you rarely have time for.

There is a companion book that increases the number of skills to 14 or 20 for more in-depth games, but the basic seven-skill game is good enough for most science fiction. In Star Wars-type pulp science fiction, a vehicle character is good at nearly any vehicle, and the combat specialist excels in both melee and ranged combat. In a universe where "anything goes," a pilot shares proficiencies between speeders and starships, that "vehicle control" skill applies to a wide range of things, and "you just don't worry about it."

Having a specific "Model 301 antigrav speeder" skill in a science fiction setting would lead to having millions of skills and a character sheet as long as a typical 5E character, dozens of pages long. In pulp settings, reduce the skill list and focus on broader proficiency categories.

If you want a difference between melee combat and ranged combat, do the 14 skills. If all you care about is "this is a combat character," then stick with 7 skills, and it does not matter. If you are going to have to buy up your melee skills to the same level as your ranged weapon skills, why not combine them? Also, if you find yourself favoring ranged combat skills, you are denying yourself chances to take advantage of melee attacks.

If the soldier is the "combat guy," then he can shoot, punch, kick, use a knife, wrestle, and fire a starship turret just as well as any other combat task. There is an elegance to one combat skill that many games lose once you are buying separate skills for knives and short swords.

The game has archetypes, so it is not "just skills," and these give you special "class benefits" in an area of activities based on archetype. The referee can also use this to cover a wider range of activities, such as a diplomat interacting with others, having the knowledge diplomats would have, exclusive access, and immunities by treaty and roles in society. You can even use these as unlocks for using weapons and gear, such as a soldier or pilot knowing how to drive a tank, where a diplomat or scholar would not.

There is a talent system that allows even more customization beyond this, ensuring you are not pigeon-holed into a specific role. Some of these support combat, social, technical, piloting, and other activities, so you can specialize within a role and get the benefits of a "5E subclass" with a far easier system.

What is interesting is that the game does away with ability scores. If you are super-strong, that would be more of a talent than a high ability score. The standard rack of ability scores gets min-maxed in OSR and 5R games anyway, and it only exists to be gamed for a single or dual benefit. Why not get rid of ability scores and pick a "charismatic" talent instead of gimping an ability score rack for one high CHR stat? The talent is far more flavorful, can be tailored to cover a specific benefit, and it does not introduce a rack of ability scores to track and manage.

Simplify, archetype, collect, aggregate, and focus on iconic roles.

FTL Nomad is a solid, modern, streamlined game that is an excellent alternative for any 2d6 system.

Roll for Combat: Best of 5E

The Roll for Combat books are among the best for 5E. I have a lot of garbage for 5E, and 90% of it could go, and I would be happier if I did. But these books, plus a generic full-featured 5E implementation, such as Tales of the Valiant?

This is good stuff. These are every bit the equal of a major publisher release, and are on the level of an "official expansion" of any version of the game you play.

Instead of making races as "flavorless dough" options of "say what you are" and shifting a few points around, we get full ancestry classes, feats, and options that improve as you level. Solid design and care are put into these options. They level up, get powers, give you that "full hit" of playing a dragon, fae, or whatever ancestry is in the book, and supply the full experience instead of a watered-down "oh, you are that, too" of the core rules.

Do I want to play any type of dragon and have full rules support for that as I level up?

This is the only place it happens.

And this is written for all ages, and I would be comfortable giving it to a younger audience, saving them from a book with "sex coded" elements and themes. It is innocent, written for all ages, and fun. Not even D&D 2024 can say that, and that is sad. There is an art and discipline to putting together an "all ages book," and the RfC books get it perfectly. ToV also does better in this department, keeping things innocent, clean, and for everybody.

I am not against those themes, but they should be in books where those topics can be discussed and shared fully, not snuck in and hidden like Easter Eggs, as they are ultimately distractions and inappropriate for all audiences. Even topics like demons and devils are treated with care in these books, and they are not as objectionable as the Tiefling ancestry is in most core books (since the game often ignores the infernal aspects and just presents them as innocent cosplay).

It is sort of shocking and stupid that the half-elves and half-orcs are removed from most of the new games, while demon-blooded characters are everywhere. I guess pop culture gotta "pop" someone out of reality and exclude somebody to please somebody else. 5E has so much of this baggage that I tire of the constant war waged on the pages and play other games. I want to escape to a fantasy world, not be reminded of this one.

Which is why innocent, all-ages games appeal to me so strongly. They have a classic, clean, and beautiful innocence untouched by the problems of this world. They are books about playing a dragon or a mimic. They deliver innocent fun, just like a Mario game does.

The Roll for Combat books are on my "best of 5E" list, and they are where I am starting my 5E library rebuild. Tales of the Valiant is my core 5E, just so I don't have to be reminded about the OGL or things like "we can't leave the hobby" remarks. Those are hurtful things, and I don't want to be reminded of them while playing a game for escapist fun.

Mail Room: Battlezoo Hardcovers

The Roll for Combat Battlezoo hardcovers are one of the only things keeping 5E around for me. I got a few in the mail from the latest crowdfunding campaign, and I like them so much that I keep 5E on my shelves, using Tales of the Valiant as the game's driving engine.

The books are all ages, with no "sexual coding" in them, meant for everybody, and they have an innocence and fun factor to them. Even Tales of the Valiant has that "for everybody" innocence, something I wish D&D had. You can play a dragon, or a mimic, or a vampire, or a gargoyle, or...

It is just fun.

Innocent.

Cool.

And the books are fun.

Recommended, and if this is all you have out for 5E, plus the ToV books, it is a fun and worthy game.

Dungeon Crawl Classics

Dungeon Crawl Classics is D&D done right.

I keep coming back to this game. It has survived being put in the garage storage crates twice, yet it sits on my best display shelf today. If it displays really well, and it plays even better. It focuses on being a fun game before anything else. It doesn't worry about "platform lock in" or "digital strategies" - it just looks fun, plays fun, and is fun.

Many in the OSR are sour grapes about this game for little good reason. It is probably just jealousy and pettiness. DCC did what many OSR games could not, and it is the third-most-played fantasy RPG (by the Gen Con scheduled games metric). They have done well by focusing on core beliefs, keeping the game simple and accessible, and making sure every part of the game brings fun to the table.

It started with re-reading Appendix N books and going back to the basics. Too often in the OSR, you will find strict adherence to the B/X, White Box, BECMI, or 1E rules. Rules are what make it fun, right?

No, the rules are a tool to "get to" fun; they aren't fun by themselves.

Too often, the OSR puts the rules on a pedestal and expects the fun to happen. It can, but you have to know the secret to make them work that way. When you are at that point, any OSR game will do, and they are all interchangeable. But none of the OSR games do what DCC does: support emergent play and have fun built into the core classes.

DCC uses just enough rules to get the point across, then builds the rest of the framework around "how the game was fun back in the day." The fiction is the guide, and a past edition of the rules is not a milestone by which to measure the game. The game uses the OSR dialect, but it is not an OSR game.

Shadowdark does the same. It focuses on "how the game is fun" and jettisons the rest.

5E, in comparison, is far too heavy. It gets bogged down in silly subclasses and class builds. It goes on too long, describing a class and its power, sometimes dozens of pages, when just a handful would do. 5E hides a lot of complexity, and you end up paying for it later, six to eight levels in, when you quit, because your character sheet is longer than a tax form. And all that complexity and rules bloat does not get you much more than an easy, simple, straightforward game that puts roleplaying and fun first.

The OSR games are easy, and they put the character and fun first. Not the rules. Not platform lock-in. Not digital sales. Not forcing you to buy two copies of the book, one for your shelf and the other for your online character creation tool. 5E is too expensive and complex, when an easy game is just as much fun.

DCC gets it.

It keeps coming back to my shelf because it delivers on its promise. Level 10 in DCC is the same power level as level 20 in 5E. It cuts to the chase and delivers what is fun, tossing aside hundreds of pages of unnecessary rules to keep the game flowing.

5E takes a lot of money and time to sort out, and like a pile of Skyrim mods, it can be incredibly fun. Still, it ultimately breaks under its own weight when it tries to do something it was never designed to do, and gets overextended to the point where a more straightforward game delivers on the promise.

5E always breaks down for me.

DCC is too simple and fun to ever break down.

BackerKit: Castle Whiterock (DCC)

https://www.backerkit.com/c/projects/goodman-games/castle-whiterock

The Castle Whiterock mega-dungeon for DCC & 5E is over on BackerKit, and the price was very reasonable for what you get. I expected this to be three times the price, and it came in on what I wanted to spend. There are plenty of shiny add-ons, but the basic clamshell boxed set, plus hardcover (in the first 48 hours only, softcover after), was a great deal.

Some companies still keep gaming affordable and fun, and Goodman Games has a winner here. Backed and supporting.

The Death of Fantasy Slop

I feel the tide turning.

I saw a review of Nimble today criticizing the "too broad" fantasy race options and saying it didn't feel like a defined world; the modern "anything goes" mish-mash of fantasy backgrounds didn't feel real to them. The game itself and the rules were great, but that modern "fantasy slop" of "any race is valid" was tiring to them.

I love Nimble, but I feel that way too.

While I love having choices, I get that same old feeling of choice paralysis when walking down the cereal aisle as I do when picking a fantasy race. There are far, far too many options in these games; designers have given up on worldbuilding, and as referees, we are expected to "support any idea" that drops by our table. Forget that the world we built (or play in) does not have cat or demon people; if someone wants to play one, we have to make adjustments and change our world to fit their idea.

Normally, I would be cool with this. But lately, it just makes me tired. Fantasy worlds are planar bus stops, filled with anything and everything wandering through. For some worlds, that works, but I sense the general consensus is moving away from that direction.

People want defined races in a sandbox world with history and consequence.

Every fantasy game does not need to look like the cantina in Star Wars.

I miss the days of the core four: human, elf, dwarf, and halfling. That's it! If you want to play gruff and dour, play a dwarf. Practical jokers and foodies, play halflings. Elegant and noble, play an elf. Everyone else plays humans. It is a simplification, but the simplicity in a world where some games offer time travelers and cyborgs as race options is welcome.

Race-as-class reduces the urge to keep adding new races, since they would all be new class designs in the game and thus hard to design and support.

And this is not a question of "real world diversity," which is how many frame it. I was bused as a kid, and I loved the experience of different cultures and races. None of my best friends looked like me, and we all played D&D as the outcast nerds. We had black kids, a gay kid in a tracksuit, and me in our D&D club, and the modern feeling "not enough diverse kids played D&D back in the 1980s" is a complete lie. Teachers would confiscate our dice and books as "Satanic literature and trinkets." We didn't have phones or PDFs back then, either.

TSR had a diverse player base for D&D. The affordability of a hobby in general helps adoption across all backgrounds. This is why the OSR today is a far more diverse place than a hobby exclusively for the wealthy, which is where corporate gaming is headed.

And a world with "just humans" can be incredibly diverse (hello, Earth).

This is a question of game design.

As a referee, creating a world like that is hard. I could give up and make it that planar bus stop, but a part of me stops caring about the world and designing a cohesive history. With the core four, I can design a world and keep the lore and history straightforward. As a world-builder, my job is easier the fewer options I have. When the selection gets into dozens of races, my mind begins to overload, and the game is harder to referee, in that my worldbuilding now needs to take into account "X squared" numbers of interactions between all the races, and sub-factions within each race, so it could even be "X cubed."

How do dwarves feel about parrot people? Plant people? Stone elementals? Fae dragons? Coconut puppets? Tieflings? Half vampires? Skeleton races? Ghosts? Living dolls? Dark elves? Light elves? Stone elves? Mimic races? Changelings? Werewolves? Cat people? Weasel people? Magic cloud full of sparkle races? A random race stolen from the next popular anime person? Octopus people? Normalized mind flayer races? Beholders as player options? Displacer beast kin? And now figure there are subfactions within each one of those races...the good mind flayers versus the bad ones.

And I just give up.

It's a planar bus stop.

I am not doing worldbuilding for this mess.

Or I will just go play a game with fewer options and be happier.

Like our incredibly diverse D&D club in the 1980s did.

Traveller 5E Update

I am happy to see the Traveller 5E campaign doing well and nearing the half-million mark. The books are still expensive; four at $80 each is not cheap, but that is the current going rate for 5E hardcovers. Many are being priced out of the market. Also, the October 2027 target is 18 months away, which is a long time to wait.

Also, shipping prices are going through the roof. I just paid $50 for shipping for one campaign, and I am seriously scaling back my pledges this year. Castle Whiterock for DCC will be my next one (4 days), and any other campaigns this year will have to be knockouts.

Granted, the PDFs will likely be out sooner, and I have not heard much on VTT or character designer support, which is a must-have for many to even consider supporting a campaign. Some versions of 5E I can't play because the tools aren't there, and even then, it is always an extra "digital purchase" in a VTT store to "own the rules there," and I feel I am being fleeced by the 5E industry again.

I can play Traveller with the 2d6 system today, or even cheaper (and free options) with the Cepheus system. There is a massive price gap between the free Cepheus Engine PDF and the $1,000 all-in pledge here. It sort of highlights where the entire 5E market is going, premium crowdfunding "experiences" with $1,000 buy-ins for the "ultimate fan package."

And for $1,000, I can get a much more complete and rewarding experience with GURPS or even Battletech. I could get a box of mechs that would fill a table for that much, and have months of painting to do.

I like the Traveler 5E concept; it sounds exciting. This would have been an instant buy for me last year.

This year, it isn't. Times are tough. I have Battletech and GURPS, and those are amazing games. I have a complete 2d6 Traveller collection. I have more 5E than I can play, and DCC will happily take all the attention for fantasy for me.

I don't have the time or money for this, and it is sad to see this going at such a high price point. This is the world we live in, but I do wish them well and all the success they can earn.

We are in the age of the premium 5E "fan experience," and it sort of sucks.

Backerkit: Traveller 5E

https://www.backerkit.com/c/projects/world-s-largest-rpgs/traveller-5e

If you like science fiction and 5E, this is the game to get.

But the prices are a bit of a sticker shock. $350 for the core book bundle and $1,000 for all-in. Wow, I have not seen a basic book bundle of a crowdfunding campaign this high before. I wish them all the best in selling the books at this high a price point. Licensing fees also play into this.

I would get this, but not at this price point.

Just as video gaming is becoming a hobby for the rich, tabletop gaming is moving in that direction, too. 5E is also an expensive system to support, and you can easily sink thousands (if not tens) into the hobby every year.

I like both systems, but I have Cepheus and GURPS to cover all my Traveller science fiction gaming needs. I like GURPS far better than 5E, especially for science fiction. While the MMO-ness of 5E is appealing, I would rather just play GURPS and have it all without the complicated character sheets of 5E.

That is another problem, the absolute need for character creation tools for 5E. I see Roll20 support, but how complete is that? Creating 5E characters by hand is a complete non-starter for any version of 5E. I am refusing to do that anymore after seeing character sheets print out to 16+ pages. My GURPS character sheets are only four pages for a 1,000-point character, and two pages for most other characters that I play.

And for $1,000, I could buy nearly every GURPS book ever printed and have a complete, three-shelf library of a game that can do anything. I checked this on Amazon too, and it is just under $1,000 for most of the 3rd- and 4th-edition books in PoD. Don't ask me how I know, but I have six shelves like this.

Also worth noting is EN World's 5E science fiction game based on the Level Up system. The Void Runners Codex is a complete boxed set that includes the physical books for about $200. I enjoy Level Up and have this, and it is a solid, more affordable alternative if you don't care for the Traveler universe and just want a generic, 5E science fiction system.

It is a strange world to live in, seeing GURPS as the easier game to support and play than 5E, but here we are in 2026. It comes down to preference and willingness to learn the rules, ultimately, and is a personal choice. While the core systems of 5E are easier than GURPS, in the end, character sheet complexity in 5E is an order of magnitude more complicated than GURPS, with expensive software requirements (and subscription models).

Traveller 5E is a really nice game, expensive and it shows, but it is not for me. As I get older, I have less time for these games, and I tend to stick to the ones I know and love that cover many genres. For me, that is GURPS.

It Is Time for the New

Before Tolkien, we had stories of knights and heroes, King Arthur and Sir Lancelot, Merlin and the dragon, and earlier times of Rome and the Ancient Greeks. We had the Bible, too.

I still have the Bible.

Tolkien resynthesized what came before and made it new again. The Appendix N authors were the new wave of creators, Conan and many others, who cut a blaze of glory through our minds and imaginations.

D&D came along in the 1970s and resyntisized all of that. We had a good run with that game, and eventually D&D became stale. The last real high point for the brand was pre-Wizards, in the 1990s, with the NYT Bestseller novels. But, like any IP, they never took care of the brand, never protected it from the garbage of pop culture, video games, Internet memes, and the toxic influence of social media, and the game died.

Oh, you can still buy the books, but like a necromancer resurrecting grandma, the soul of D&D isn't there anymore. It is full of anthropomorphic races, too modern anachronisms, steampunk, pink hair, Victorian trench coats with plate pauldrons, the neon-colored planes of every idea, and I don't even know what this game wants to be other than "Fortnite: Fantasy Edition."

That is the Fortnite legacy: toss a million and one random characters in the same world and put it on a blend. It is a buffet full of familiar but low-quality food. Pizza you would never touch, but since it is on the buffet, you grab a slice. And in the end, you walk away feeling sick and vow to never eat at a buffet again.

I can see why people are returning to strongly curated experiences, with the "toxic modern mashup" kept out. I don't want the goofball Fortnite crap in my games anymore.

I don't want "everything" anymore; I want "that one best part" with all the garbage kept out.

I want pizza that I would order if that is all I was eating. I want a pizza experience that I would return for. I don't want a cold, tasteless, dry, garbage slice of pizza-like bread thrown on my plate next to the turkey and mashed potatoes.

I am done with the garbage "all-in-one" experience.

They never took care of D&D, and like a pet you never take care of, it died, and there is no bringing it back. Many of us have moved on. We remember through the OSR, and needing "D und D" as some sort of three-syllable noise we make when someone asks us "what we are playing" is not all that important anymore.

In fact, D&D brings with it so much baggage, like the OGL, that many of us dislike the three-syllable sound, and it provokes a gut reaction of revulsion toward the brand. How am I supposed to play Greyhawk without alignment, D&D 5.5E? Or is it another corporate skinsuit?

"D und D" becomes the problem: the modern corporation telling us what to like, what the game is, who should play it, and the toxic social media enforcement mobs these companies wink and nod to, acting as their online thought police. How companies let this devolve to this point is beyond me; it is as if they all collectively gave up on the brand and let the mobs run the show.

Maybe there was no value there, and they were throwing everything against the wall in a desperate plea for attention. Like the end days of Fortnite and Warner Brothers, here comes Bugs Bunny to pick up an AR-15 to kill people with. Might as well go out with a bang, buddy.

Hey, all of us in the office are happy to be paid; we don't really care. The rest are pushing their own agendas with the brand. Even corporate doesn't care anymore. As long as we "move the engagement needle" like a needle filled with heroin, nobody cares.

With D&D, I get that "death of a brand" feeling all over again.

And we have better.

We have the OSR, other games, and the break with the OGL made is a divorce that was long overdue. Instead of OSR games being "D&D-likes" and a wink-and-a-nod, they were forced to innovate and become their own thing. Tribute games, like DCC, arose and became their own brands. Shadowdark emerged from the darkness. Nimble did a million dollars in its reprint and expansion. The OSR has a dozen strong games: S&W, OSRIC 3.0, ADAD, Dragonslayer, C&C, DCC, ACKS, and a few others.

Even with 5E, we have Shadowdark, Nimble, Level Up, Tales of the Valiant, and likely more replacement games coming. You can play 5E without touching D&D.

We are in the age of the D&D replacements. I have more than I can play. I can afford to be choosy. Some will collapse and fail. Others will be taken care of through this coming downturn and survive.

D&D is becoming those old comics and stories that Tolkien replaced.

And I will return to those classic fantasy comics and play them with GURPS, and turn the clock back to better days. Even simulationist gaming, like where my 250-point Sir Lancelot is struggling with a crossbow wound to the leg with bandits approaching, is better than the mess that D&D has become these days. That one story is more engaging than anything D&D or 5E can give me. What, short rest, and that wound and the pain are magically gone?

The short and the long rest are not engagement mechanics; they are narrative game mechanics meant to reduce the pain of consequence, just like that needle filled with heroin. Let's keep the goofball antics coming and not think about what happens after the trigger is pulled. Storytelling games have become part of the larger problem in gaming, as the corporations use those consequence-free tools to push engagement.

I enjoy the low-fantasy stories more these days. I don't like the modern mish-mash. I want consequences in my gaming. I want a heart. I want a story. I crave a game with a soul.

Those old comics still have that.

The old games still have that.

Creators making games to appeal to those feelings "get it."

The Nostalgia Play

When every big franchise fails, they will do the Nostalgia Play. You see this in comics, movies, TV, and superheroes, where they hire a bunch of writers and artists from the new generation to "revitalize the franchise," and it fails to deliver.

The "modern take" on an "old classic" will always fall short. No classic franchise has ever been revitalized for a new audience. I do not know why they keep doing this. Shows like K-Pop Demon Hunters show that if you want a new audience, do something new.

Do something new.

That is where your new audience waits for you.

Companies think that buying nostalgia is a gold mine, when it isn't. Most of these cultural recycling projects fail.

So, here we are with D&D. After the World of Warcraft version of D&D 4 and the Fortnite D&D 5 (which is how it all ended), what is going to come next? A rollback to AD&D? The company has no clue what it owns, other than "they should make it fit the times," and they are determined to change it all and fail again.

Let's put an OSR coat of paint on D&D 5 and see if it sells.

It is the same mess of a game with too many confusing action types and broken multiclassing. There are too many rules! The books are horribly overwritten and long. Nothing has changed, just the contact paper, fake wood veneer, they will put over the same books to try to sell them to us again.

And since reading levels are dropping like a stone and many are graduating high school unable to read, who are you going to sell a 1,000-page game to again? Tell me who this new audience is, I want to know, because there they are, over there with their faces glued to their phones. Unless you can put D&D on in a 6-second TikTok video, I don't think they know you exist.

If this generation can't read, the next one won't know how to roll dice and interpret results.

Shadowdark is an easier game for people to play "D&D" with. The rules you need to know are barely 10 digest-sized pages long. Shadowdark speaks to the "next generation" much more clearly than a thousand-page game does, lost in identity gaming and the social strife of the 2020s.

All D&D does is remind me of how many people fought over the game and "what it was." They tried to battle for the game's identity and control the hobby's cultural zeitgeist, and when it became unpopular, they all left to fight over something else. The game only exists to support their politics and ideals, and nobody really cares about the game itself, only the platform it gave them.

Everyone moved on, the end.

And the new team at D&D has an impossible job. Sell the old books and try to appeal to those who still care, yep, it's us, the grognards again. We are being asked to support them, again, and form the core audience of the next version, this time, "appealing to the old-school crowd" - just like D&D 5 did.

They always keep coming back to the grognards, and we are always the ones kicked out of the club first. THACO the clown. The warnings on older editions. "We can't leave the hobby fast enough." The D&D history book that tore down the original creators. They keep wanting us back, but they keep kicking us out at the first chance they can get. Once they get a hit and something that appeals outside of the grognards, they will show us the door as fast as they can.

But, sorry. I have better games. Dungeon Crawl Classics, Castles & Crusades, Shadowdark, Nimble, OSRIC 3.0, and many more. Even GURPS is a great experience. The Critical Role crowd moved on to Daggerheart and Nu-D&D storytelling games. So D&D wants me to give up my old friends to "come back to them?" Sorry, my old friends are great, and they like what I like, and they are not changing with the wind. They won't kick me out once they get popular.

Dungeon Crawl Classics "gets it" for me, and it isn't changing. It still calls to me, and I have two shelves dedicated to its glory. DCC is more Greyhawk than D&D 5E will ever be.

Even GURPS is more Greyhawk than D&D 5E. We used to play Greyhawk with this in the late 1980s. It was fun and felt real. I loved that game.

I don't care how much D&D wraps itself in the Gygax family and Greyhawk; the heart and soul of D&D are gone. It lives on in other games. Wizards isn't delivering NYT Bestseller paperback novels like they were in the 1990s. D&D 5E is a 12-year-old game. The company sits on a gold mine of previous editions, yet refuses to sell or support them. But then again, they would just mess them up if they did, so leave my memories alone, please.

Sorry, D&D.

I have new friends these days, and they are just fine.

I'm not coming back.

Sorry D&D, no, I'm Not Interested

I'm sorry, D&D, but I have moved on. Like any abusive relationship, I decided to end things on my terms, find other games, and enjoy my time gaming. I know you are cozying up to the old-school crowd, putting a coat of polish on Grayhawk, but I am just not all that interested in you anymore.

You are happy with your modern influencers, the endless D&D news sites (that will turn on you, give it time), and D&D YouTube, who seem to see this new outreach to the OSR crowd as a second coming of 2020. The endless hype and courting of us old-school players feels hollow.

The warnings are still on those books on the DriveThru site. The art in your books makes my eyes bleed. Your Fortnite-level of pandering with "nobody dies," "weapons do nothing here," and "identity gaming" makes my stomach turn. That "history of the game" book that accuses the original founders of being terrible people still is for sale. Orcs and humanoid monsters have still been removed from the Monster Manual.

You haven't changed.

Nor can you have it both ways.

I have found better games from people who want to be in a "gaming relationship" with me. They have given me endless enjoyment, have been "stable partners" for years now, and I am happy with them. Unlike you, which will change again and again based on the whims of your parent company, venture capital firms, and the gaming media, these companies need to focus on making me happy to survive.

The games I found "work hard at making this relationship work" for both of us. And I do my work too, support them, and make them a part of my "gaming life" so we can be "happy together."

The gaming media will turn on you, the bile and hate will come your way from the other side that hates the old-schoolers, and they will accuse you of being a terrible person, too. You don't want to "associate with us" because the people you hang out with these days have hated us, and they will always hate us because hate is the only thing they have in their empty lives.

Us? We have games and happiness in their lives, and maybe that is what they hate. You chose to hang out with that crowd, not us, and all your "new friends" are going to turn on you hard very soon. Expect headlines of "how D&D is embracing its problematic past" to land very soon from the people who used to be your friends.

Some of these companies are as progressive as you, but they know how to balance what they say with what appeals to everybody. You just went off the deep end, hoping your new friends would support you. They didn't, most moved on to other games, and you discovered that they were not really your friends, you thought they were. All they wanted was for you to say the things they wanted to hear, and they never really enjoyed being with you, only that you were popular.

And they found new friends to play with in Daggerheart and many other games.

That new audience has walked away, and here you are coming back to me?

It isn't 1980, 1990, 2000, or 2020 anymore!

Things "can't be like they were."

Even that time in 2010 when you tried to hang out with World of Warcraft players didn't work out so well, either, huh?

But 2030 will be different this time!

Sorry.

That ship has sailed. I only have a few more decades to play games, and I have better ones that make me happy and cater to what I like. Seeing you change like a chameleon again is not what I am interested in. I know you have money and can pay for nostalgia bait, but that is not writing a game that I like to play, nor does it make up for the hurt you caused with things like the OGL.

I'm not stupid like most of the D&D YouTube channels that will "forget about it all" just for a few views. "D&D is back!" they will scream, and I will casually scroll by, choosing the next video since I am just not interested in any of that anymore, just like I have given up on 5E Kickstarters and other wastes of time.

Even if I wanted to play 5E, I'd rather play something better. ToV, Level Up, and Shadowdark have orcs in the monster lists. You don't. You can't "write a Greyhawk book" and ignore that. Ald ToV and Level Up are far better balanced than modern 5E, written by people who played the game and know the pain of D&D 2014, and worked hard at making things fun again at the table.

Nimble exists, too. It gives me everything 5E does, but in far fewer pages and with far less complexity.

And we are not interested in DLC sold to us as power creep; that sales tactic just leads to the next edition dropping sooner rather than later. I hate splatbooks that are better than the original game, invalidate my original books, and introduce a new high-damage meta and baseline of play.

I've been through that time and time again with you, D&D, and I am not falling for it again.

We can't help you anymore, since most of us have already moved on to better things. We are over here enjoying our games and playing them, having fun with all the new relationships we worked hard to make. We have better games now. I am not giving them up to come running back to you.

And there are games written far better than the bloated mess D&D has become. Even if I wanted you back, there are far better presented and written games that "do the same thing" but are far easier to play, travel with, and carry around than the library you force me to maintain. I can throw Shadowdark in a laptop bag and have a complete game on the go. D&D? Sorry, I am not carrying a shelf full of books or maintaining a subscription to read my PDFs. It is thousands of pages to do the same thing Shadowdark does in tens.

And Shadowdark does a better "Greyhawk experience" than D&D, and I don't need to buy another book to "make 5E play like an old school game." I don't need to "mod the 2024 rules" with another digital purchase to "play like it is 1980 again." It is another book, hundreds of pages of rules, on top of a game already over 1,000 pages long. Only to see someone drop in with a DLC build meant to break the game with power creep, and all of a sudden, my "authentic Greyhawk game" is broken by your digital sales department.

I have games that understand the original experience and are written to provide just that.

And they are easier to manage and play.

And I am over you.

OSRIC 3: Hacking the Bard

There are no bards in OSRIC 3.0, at least, not yet.

The bard is turning out to be a bit controversial these days, and some groups don't like them because they weren't part of the original game. They do not add much to a traditional "dungeon crawling" party, nor do they support the classic "fighter, mage, thief, cleric" holy quadrology. Also, bards tend to attract the wrong type of player, the "spotlight hog" who ends up wanting to RP for everybody and who takes over every social interaction between the party and every NPC in the world.

If you have the best social skills, charmiest charms, and have the highest chance to "get through the required social skill rolls" part of the adventure, why not just lean on the bard some more? Social skill rolls and giving one class "all the RP skills" were among the worst additions to the game, as they siloed all RP in the game's only "diva" social class.

You can even make people do whatever you wish, even without their consent. It is a great class for Hollywood casting-couch types. Seriously, the amount of mental manipulation they give most bards in most games makes them the sleaziest character class ever written, and I would trust a thief more than a bard. At least with the thief, you will be allowed to be angry after he robs you.

Be careful about adding bards to your game. If your game is more about detecting poison needles on treasure chests, listening to doors, and quietly dispatching enemies in a stealth run through a dungeon to take its loot, why do you want a "Rock Band" wannabe along, making blasted noise? Do you know how far "bard singing" carries for? Two or three rooms, typically. You are going to give every monster in the area a free concert? We will have the dwarf shove a bag in your mouth to keep you quiet.

Bards are not for everyone; they silo RP, attract disruptive players, and shift the game's focus onto themselves as spotlight stealers. It is hard to design a great bard class without breaking the classic dungeon-based game. Most designers follow the D&D 5E mentality toward bards, and they deliberately design the class to be disruptive roleplay hogs.

Every class should be potentially "great at RP." My dwarf fighter, talking with other dwarves, about an honor-bound blood oath between dwarven clans? I don't care how high the elven bard's persuasion skill is; my dwarf will be the best at speaking to those matters, and quite possibly the only one who will be listened to. In D&D 5E? Forget it, the rules trump common sense, and the elven bard will do the talking. My dwarf will be reduced to saying "he's right" and "the elf makes sense!"

You do have a few options if you want bards in OSRIC 3.0. The first is to port a bard in from another game, such as Swords & Wizardry. This is the easiest way to do it, but it relies on having more books and rulesets around.

The next is to say bards are essentially multi-class thief/clerics or thief/magic-users with music as their focus (divine or arcane), and leave it at that. Leave the singing to RP, and just let the game's core classes define abilities. Since you are multi-class, you will level slower, but you are a hybrid with the powers of two classes, so prepare to walk the long, hard road of stardom. You will channel your magic through song and just redefine the game's existing abilities into "bard stuff" that you cast through the power of magical music. On the plus side, you will always be a full thief, and not these weak "half thieves" other games allow you to be.

I like this solution a lot since it keeps the game's core classes intact and shifts the flavor's focus to new sources of power. A cleric could be the cleric of a demon lord, and you would just reflavor the powers, but still keep the character a cleric. A kobold could channel arcane "magic user" power through shamanistic rituals, and the implementation stays the same as other magic users. This is a clean, simple, easy solution that requires no expansions, other books, or external material. It reinterprets what is there into a new method and outlook on casting magic, and keeps the fundamental roles and spells balanced.

My bard isn't "less than a thief" or "less of a caster" than other classes, only in the rate of advancement. The combinations of powers will enhance the character in many ways, while not gimping them in functioning as either a thief or a caster. You need a thief? Well, the bard will do, but they won't be as good as a dedicated thief, just due to the slower rate of advancement, but they can do everything a thief does, even backstab. Other games take that away from the bard, but this solution doesn't.

The final answer is to play Castles & Crusades, but that is another discussion entirely.

Mail Room: OSRIC 3 Hardcovers

There is a tendency in the OSR to muck things up, add too much bloat to the game, and put in so many new ideas that we lose the brilliance of the original game. Part of the reason I loved Old School Essentials Classic Fantasy was the beautiful simplicity; there are not many ways to go wrong with buttered toast, and OSE Classic was the perfect, simple, atomic, perfect recreation of the original game.

OSRIC 3.0 is exactly like that, but for AD&D.

Where Adventures Dark & Deep goes off the deep end of the pool with hundreds of pages of new additions ot the game, the ideas feel muddled and overly complex, where if all I wanted was an AD&D 1E clone, then I do not need all that extra fluff and positing of what could be.

There are times I want only the base game.

I want simple.

I want the best options.

I want a clean and streamlined game.

If I want to play just like it was the 1980s again, OSRIC 3.0 is the perfect game. The PDFs are PWYW, and you can get a free option if you're just checking them out for curiosity.

There is a post on Dragonsfoot that compares AD&D and OSRIC 3.0, and many of the differences stem from carefully considered legal reasons. The differences are extremely minor and not really a game-changer, and are only for rules lawyers. Some are welcome simplifications and clarifications (one roll to pick pockets, and rules for high-STR characters wielding 2H weapons with one hand). I like the changes and improvements, and this version is far clearer written than the original AD&D 1E PHB and DMG.

If I were starting new players with 1E, I would be playing OSRIC 3.0. Never has there been a clearer, easier-to-learn, and well-represented version of the game than this. This is a cleaner-presented, product-improved 1E with all the best options and mechanics.

And the game is derived from the Creative Commons release under a new, more open license. The now-hated OGL is finally gone from OSRIC! The game is free to live its own life without legal threats.

Stepping up from a BX set of rules to full 1E is a refreshing experience. A lot of what was left vague for younger audiences is cleared up in the full 1E version of the rules, and there is less room for interpretation in critical areas. OSRIC 3.0 seems easier than OSE in a few ways, with clearer rules for things that will come up during the game, and there will be less "winging it" at the table and more straightforward play and adventure.

Gary Gygax wrote AD&D for organized and tournament play, and the rules were designed to address the most common questions and situations that arose during play. While BX is perfectly playable at conventions and public settings, 1E clarifies many things individual groups would have to "make up on the fly" or "wing it," and standardizes play, keeping organized play clearer, fairer, and more consistent across game masters.

If you are playing organized play, 1E is a far better choice since less is left up to interpretation. Everything is compatible, from BX to games like Swords & Wizardry, so if you want adventures or more character options, they are there for the picking. The OSE Drow race? Use them as-is. The bard from Swords & Wizardry? Use that as-is. It all works together nicely.

But basing your game on OSRIC gives you a simple, consistent, and clean start. This is something more advanced, expanded games can't deliver, since you tend to have to "take in everything at once," and you lose that beautiful simplicity I like to see in a game.

How Far We Have Fallen

Never did I ever imagine we would have Bugs Bunny put in a game where kids use high-power military assault weapons to kill each other. If this were the 1980s, this would have been enough to get a CEO and the entire board of directors fired and run out of the entertainment business for life.

But here we are.

No wonder D&D sucks. This is the corporate thinking these days. This is the Wall Street zeitgeist. This is where "you can't die in a role-playing game" comes from. You can take a shotgun blast to the face and sleep it off in D&D 5E. This whole notion that stabbing someone or shooting them "doesn't do anything" makes me want to vomit. This is why roleplaying sucks. There are zero consequences for actions; the game has safety tools to prevent the referee from using them, death is impossible, and avatars are goofy animals in silly costumes. The entire game is a fantasy fulfillment simulator with self-identity coding and sexual overtones.

D&D owners and shareholders, this is where you went wrong. You don't need a survey to tell you what is right in front of your own eyes.

Foxy the cute fox man can't have his head blown off by a 5.56mm NATO assault rifle! You will scar me for life! It's "damage"; this is a "game." I am throwing up an X now! I identify as him! Sorry, that is a real weapon, and we treat real weapons with respect. We are too far down this road in real life to ignore this now. The world is at war. This may come home at any time. Shootings are on the news nearly every day. Foxy was cute, but he is dead. There are fox brains all over the wall behind him. Roll a new character.

There is a quote in this video:

"I don't think he understands that weapons don't do anything here..."

As the players get on a school bus.

God, I miss the 1980s. Do you know the outrage this would cause? Multiple state attorneys general would be on their ass about this. Donahue would be running this for two weeks. The nightly news would lead with this for days, Peter Jennings, Dan Rather, and the rest, all with grave undertones of what this is doing to our children's impressionable minds. Front page news around the country. Time and Newsweek would be doing stories on how corporations are militarizing our children and how gun manufacturers are profiting.

Are all you 1980s liberals dead, or did you just never believe the things you were saying back then? Where are you, people? We need you. This is your last chance to make a stand and say what is right. I know I am. But I am just one Gen-X'er with a stupid blog.

And here we are.

Now they got to Bugs Bunny, and that part of me will forever see this.