OSRIC 3: Rediscovering the Game

I was doing a few battles between a level one, level two, and level three party against 1-3 HD creatures, and wow, is this a good game. Taking damage means something! There are no easy rests, so every choice is hard. If I take damage, do I spend a healing spell I may need later for comfort? Or do I save and push forward a bit banged up, but still within my comfort zone to keep going?

Institutionalized resting is one of the worst rule additions we have ever seen in the game's history.

D&D 3 started pushing the video-game mentality hard into the game, with players treating every adventure as a CRPG, where they feel they could "go back to town" every 15 minutes to refresh resources for the next encounter. Adventure writers never pushed the idea that "you get one chance" in the adventure, or that the monsters get reinforcements, ambush the party on the way back, flee, or kill the captives they were trying to rescue.

The game's acceptance of risk-averse behavior destroyed D&D's heart and soul.

So they introduced institutionalized resting into the rules, using hit dice as a resting resource to encourage parties to "stay in the dungeon" and "avoid going back to town." What was already a terrible assumption- that D&D is a tabletop video game- started killing the game. D&D got more and more like a video game, with infinite-use MMO spells that made casters "shooty" and made all the classes feel like MMO counterparts. Rogues became "DPS classes" and "everyone got healing."

Going back to OSRIC, I see the original game again. Your fighter is down to 16 HP from 20, and you are accepting the risk of going into the next room with a wounded frontline fighter. Your magic user has two of three spells left. Your cleric still has healing. Your thief took 2 HP of damage and is down to 10 HP. Your archer is down 5 arrows from 20. Of the 700 coins your party can carry, you have 150sp, which doesn't really pay the bills.

You look at those resources and decide you can push further. In some cases, like a rescue, you must push further, or the townspeople will be sacrificed to the frog god. You have a time limit. The road here is dangerous, with encounters along the way. You don't want the froglings to reinforce the entrance and trap you in the halls on the second foray. You have surprise and initiative, and coming back tomorrow means the fights get harder against a prepared enemy with traps, allies, outside patrols, and poisoned weapons.

While they're surprised, keep pushing the attack.

You look at your party's state again and wonder if you'll get out of here alive.

The elimination, simplification, and abstraction of resource management removed all of the tension and challenge from the game. You no longer need to be a "smart poker player" at the table to judge odds; D&D 5E flat-out tells you the party should "win all encounters." There are no losers. There is no risk. There is no danger. There is no tension. Gold means nothing.

There is no reason to play the game.

It is all self-centered "story gaming" and fake reasons to engage with the narrative. The world doesn't care and doesn't matter; it is a backdrop for your interpersonal drama. Like players on an "RP server" in an MMO who never challenge themselves or play the game, the world just sits there as a backdrop for their stories. That is fine, and they have the right, but it gets boring and pointless once nobody plays anymore. D&D 5E has institutionalized the story-game mentality, and all those monsters and treasures really don't matter. Your powers don't matter.

The rules say "everyone wins" and "you should be able to safely have X encounters in a day."

Build optimization is not D&D.

The truth is, I can roleplay only using a ham sandwich. I don't need a 16-page printed 5E character sheet to roleplay and tell stories. All those special powers and action economy choices slow the game down and distract from the core gameplay loop. When we sat down to play, we made no build decisions or turn optimizations within an action economy, and all decisions stayed in the game, live, as we played. Press forward or retreat? What is the cost? Can we go a little longer? Do we take this fight? How do I spend these limited resources?

And my OSRIC classes"do more" than a comparable 5E version. If I pick a ranger in OSRIC, I am the same ranger I am in 5E, but the game is easier to play. If "something comes up that a ranger should know how to do," like setting a trap or building a shelter, I ask my referee, and my referee lets me do it. That does not need to be a subclass ability, a feat, or written into the rules. Today's games tell you if it is not in the book, you can't do it. In OSRIC, you are what you are. In 5E, you are what the rules allow you to be.

In 1E, we used our brains and this thing called imagination, and we worked it out.

The party weighs risk versus reward.

No MMO mechanics institutionalize bad behavior.

Character sheets are simple, and the classes are iconic.

The game feels real again.

My 1990s Games

I am going through a strange phase where all my best 1990s games are making it onto my premier display shelves. Two exceptions are Traveller (more 1980s) and Dungeon Crawl Classics (2010s), but all the rest are solid 1990s games, around the time of the late 1980s and early 1990s:

• Palladium
• Rifts
• Champions
• Hero System
• AD&D
• GURPS
• Traveller

Two notable differences: AD&D is OSRIC, not the 1990s AD&D 2nd Edition. Vampire: The Masquerade is not represented. I have VtM, but I don't have room for it. Some of the editions are newer, such as Hero System/Champions and GURPS. Traveller for the 1990s should be MegaTraveller, which I have, but the base game and Cepheus fill the need nicely. Open and community licenses always win in this house.

Cyberpunk should be on these shelves too, and I will look for it. That is one that is in my garage now, but it belongs with them. Classic Shadowrun belongs here too, but I am a little cool on the 6th Edition. Maybe 4th will work.

Palladium and Rifts are on my shelves, and they bring me more happiness there than the 5E books they replaced. All I want are good times and great memories, and 5E feels hollow and lifeless to me. Some Open 5E editions are great, but I haven't really played with any of them, and I'd choose a game I played with friends in the 1980s and 1990s over today's crowdfunded, too-many-books versions.

Palladium is a system I can count on. Rifts is still awesome, and it is the game "your mom gets you if she is really cool." Not my words; one of my friends said that. And she was a really cool mom.

I will play a game with great memories over a modern game I feel nothing for.

As the 1980s fade into history, the real nostalgia upon us will be for this era, and I feel it. The 90s were a decade of change that saw TSR go bankrupt and D&D's future come into doubt. Comics ruled the era. Magic: The Gathering killed tabletop RPGs. But some of the best, highly tuned, post-Golden Age games were made during this time, and they delivered on the fantasy just as well. Champions/Hero System remains one of the best superhero games ever written and one of the best generic systems outside of GURPS.

If D&D 5.5E is Windows 11 Home Edition, Hero System is a Linux distribution for power users that still gets the job done. Hero System is one of those games that, once you learn it, you have zero reason to open a 5E book again, unless your group won't play anything else.

Hero System is the best game ever designed for special powered beings. I don't care what genre you play; if it relies on special powers, you should play Hero System and be happy here. Once you know how to DIY a power, you will never accept game designer handouts that are poorly thought through and never balanced. I have been burned too many times by 5E books, and even some official ones, to keep seeing them as competent game designers.

The biggest difference between Hero System and GURPS is that Hero System focuses more on powers than skills, while GURPS does the opposite. GURPS has the best setting books. Champions focuses on whiz-bang comic book powers and is the best system for them. GURPS does gritty, low-fantasy games best, whereas Hero System does high-magic, high-fantasy games best, and that feels more like 5E to me.

Hero System beats 5E for me since I can design anything I want and stop waiting for crowdfunding books to fill the next gap. Do I want a Pokemon to show up? I can design the Pokemon, and the book has all the powers somewhere. This is the easiest system for an "anything goes" campaign, and one of the best-balanced "powers" games ever written.

The "complete" books for this Hero System are simplified, easy-to-grasp starter sets that are the best entry point into the hobby. They have one for fantasy and another for superheroes. Champions Complete or Fantasy Hero Complete: start there and never look back. These are one-book games that will get you started.

Even Western Hero if you want a more grounded game without special powers. This is a Hero 6th Edition game, so it uses the newest rules, and since you are not as focused on powers, it is a good way to introduce yourself to the system. If all you are doing is fist fights and shooting guns, you will get a good introduction to combat and skill use without powers coming into play.

OSRIC carries my AD&D game, and I have For Gold & Glory, the 2E clone, and it deserves a spot. They're the same game, just presented differently, and FG&G even omits demons and devils, as 2E did. FG&G drops the assassin and adds the bard, though 1E bards exist in other community add-ons. For me? OSRIC is it, the greatest game ever written and the community version of it. I need nothing else.

I still like FG&G a lot. The game is beautiful and worthy.

GURPS always has a spot, too. We loved GURPS in the 1990s, and our love of Car Wars lasted into 2000. Our Car Wars campaign lasted 20 years. GURPS is one of those games I can pick up and never be let down by it or have it break. When I want something solid, reliable, and the best character-creation tool in the hobby, I reach for GURPS.

With GURPS, I don't need 5E. I have the tools to do it myself. While Hero System is similar, both systems are great and do what they focus on very well. GURPS is the better character builder; Hero System is the better power builder - though GURPS Supers is no slouch. If you see heroes as reflections of a character, you will gravitate towards GURPS. If you see heroes as someone defined by powers, Hero System will appeal to you more.

I have Edge Studios Star Wars on my shelves, but Star Wars is dying, and I may swap those shelves for something that speaks to me more. Sorry, Star Wars, we loved you, but you did this to yourself. You lost your way and made yourself irrelevant. It is a sad end for a great brand, and I feel D&D is following the same path. I'd rather play my older games and keep the good memories than be subjected to negativity and strife over the game's future direction. I don't care about the future direction for some of these games anymore; I have the versions I love right here.

Another missing 1990s game is Rolemaster. I have this in an upstairs closet, and once I make room, it can escape onto my shelves. While I love RMFRP, I would support the new version to keep the company around. It is still a worthy, solid 1990s-style game that delivers.

I am probably missing a few here, but these were our 1990s games. These deliver for me. These have memories. Some have fallen off, but most still feel good to me.

While I love the 1980s, the 1990s were the second-best decade for tabletop gaming. Even the second-best stands a mile above gaming today, as long as some of my 1980s stalwarts hang around on the shelves.

It Begins

I got an email today from Wizards (from my D&D Beyond account that I never use) stating:

Big changes have come to Wizards Accounts

It now runs on a new account system, giving you more digital access across Hasbro and Wizards of the Coast brands.

Sign in to check out your account profile and make sure everything looks up to date.

If you have social accounts connected to your profile, you'll need to relink them the first time you sign in.

Your Wizards Account is an all-access pass to the Hasbro + Wizards Family of Brands.

So it is not really a D&D Beyond or Wizards account anymore; it is a Hasbro "all-access pass." Notice they put Hasbro first. We will look back on this moment as the first signal of the next major change in D&D and every other game they make.

When I log in, will I get Transformers, MTG, and GI JOE news pushed to my feed before I have to dig for the D&D section? I get why they did this; why let new products fail to reach an audience when you have a huge platform here that isn't helping them? But I also don't want Transformers spam before I set up a D&D game. This also solves the problem of platforms like YouTube not pushing their live-play shows, and having those wither and die because nobody knows they exist.

This is clearly a "my audience is mine" sort of play, and also a statement that social media platforms aren't doing their job pushing the hobby they once were (or the price to feature content as a premium partner has skyrocketed). YouTube telling D&D creators to "find something else to make videos on" seemed very sus at the time, and I always wondered if the checks stopped coming in and YouTube started pulling D&D videos off people's recommended lists.

If that is the case, I can't blame Wizards for taking their audience and running. If Wizards can get D&D YouTubers to create over there and share revenue, that would be good. I doubt it, though.

From the FAQ:

Which brands, websites, and products are included?

You can use your Wizards account to log in to a variety of existing and future Wizards and Hasbro products. Current products include:

• Magic: The Gathering Arena
• Magic: The Gathering Companion App
• EventLink
• Wizards Play Network (WPN)
• Store & Event Locator
• SpellTable
• Secret Lair
• Dungeons & Dragons Beyond App
• Dungeons & Dragons Beyond Website
• Dungeons & Dragons Store Website

When future games such as Exodus release, you will be able to sign in with your Wizards account as well.

So this unifies the MTG and D&D logins, which is a bit surprising it took this long. This feels like they're trying to become a more generic "gaming platform" rather than a collection of games with different sites and audiences. With new releases coming out (such as Exodus) that people have low confidence in, this gives them a channel to farm interest and push the IP, and the same could be said for some of their video games, though AAA gaming is dead and dying.

If the next Xbox and a good video card cost close to two grand, then yeah, consoles and AAA gaming are dead. People will run games off CPU graphics for the next 10 years. Video cards will slowly die, and will the silicon be affordable enough to replace them? It is a good time to be a retro gamer, though, and even the retro RPG space is better than many current offerings. Cutting-edge PC gaming is facing an extinction-level event. As PC gaming gets more expensive, Wizards and D&D will have less money.

So, survival is job number one. If Wizards has to pay through the nose to get its new products out there, fewer channels are covering them, D&D YouTubers are quitting and cutting back, and YouTube isn't recommending D&D, it might as well consolidate its market and push new games directly to its customers. What else can they do? I don't blame them.

This also feels like something a company does before it preps itself for a merger or sale.

Off the Shelf: Hero System 6E / Champions

When the original Marvel Superheroes went out of print, Champions saved superhero gaming for us. This was in the early 1990s, when Marvel and Star Wars were still small brands, and TSR lost the rights to Marvel. We were left with a pile of Marvel gazetteers, a DC game we liked but never really played, and superheroes were changing to the Image Comics and Wildstorm style.

Marvel was dead.

Even trading cards couldn't save it.

And we were left with a few superhero games without a system. Sure, we could still run Marvel Super Heroes (MSH), but the game ran its course, and like Star Frontiers, the d100 system limited high-level play. And along came Champions.

In our home game, the Champions heroes and villains stepped all over the Marvel Universe of the 1980s. Our universes collided, and the Champions' bad guys were so much better than Marvel's. Mechanon, Dr. Destroyer, and Eurostar savaged the Avengers and X-Men simply because they were better-designed characters, not Marvel's soft, one-trick power ponies.

Champions is a professional-level superhero system designed to do anything. Unlike GURPS, which is more skill-focused, Champions focuses purely on powers and abilities, with skills as a minor part of the game. Champion is professional home audio, hi-fi gear, expensive speakers, heavy-gauge speaker wire, great amps, a powerful subwoofer, a professional mixer and receiver, and a record player with a diamond-tipped needle.

Champions felt like pro home theater gear compared to the cheap Sears hi-fi record player in a fiberboard stand with a black plastic lid and two cassette decks on top of a cheap Marvel Super Heroes AM/FM radio.

And what did we do with this system?

We converted our D&D Mystara campaign to it. Oh yes, this was good stuff; we were playing 5E in 1993. We had superpowered fantasy heroes long before many of you were born. Magic spells were multi-powers; elemental spells could summon ice creatures, and the speed chart was your bonus actions if you could afford them. The spells were good, and you could design them down to the hex pattern of the AOE. You could put magic spells in items and give them charges. Someone designed a magic mind-control helmet and made the goblins in the first cave in Keep on the Borderlands fight the other factions until they died. You still can't do this in 5E, yet we got up to all sorts of incredibly fun, silly stuff back in the 1990s.

Did the book care where the powers came from? No. If you were a mage, you had these limitations; if you were a cleric, you had those. You got more points for spells and powers. If you were a fighter, you had ability scores in the 30s and 40s, and you were a muscle-bound freak with tons of hits and skin so thick that crossbow bolts bounced off of it.

So I recently compared this system to 5E, and it is still the better game. It's dense at the start, but the complexity stays linear and flat as you go up power levels. In 5E, it just gets worse: turns drag on because nobody knows what to do, and battles become one-sided blowouts. All that indecision for a predetermined outcome.

And there are far fewer books than a 5E library.

And they do 1000 times more.

I can design any power fantasy in any genre with these books. And I am not paying game designers to do it for me and trickle out the next cool thing in a book that costs 50-80 dollars. All I need to do is learn the system, and I never need to blow money on 5E books that slow-drip options and force us to buy the book twice for the VTT version.

Champions and Hero System: you make your own balance. If you don't know the system, your character dies until you figure it out and get the next power you need to defend against whatever killed you last time. Low-powered, humans-only games are like GURPS with a very limited skill list. No superpowers; there's little reason to play, but the system is solid and still works well. As a universal resolution system, it runs fast, and it is skill-light.

And Champions characters were much better than Marvel characters. These were characters built for that high-end audio setup, far better tuned and crafted than heroes who let the spandex do their marketing. And, to be honest, you didn't care if a Champions character died; they weren't anyone, but another hero could replace them and pick up the torch. The game was dangerous because the characters were a bit generic and relied on comic-book tropes.

You could run an X-Men game where the characters regularly died and were never resurrected or retconned back to life because marketing complains and the artists don't know how to draw anyone else. We don't need the Krakoa recycling-waste-management island to bring everyone back so new writers can ruin them all.

Your characters died, and you created new ones.

Yes, you could retcon with a "comic book trope" and bring popular characters back to life, but you never had to, and you didn't need to. The fallen heroes got a marble statue in the city park, and people remembered them for their sacrifices. That was a part of the fun of playing a superhero RPG; few get that these days. We are forced to play with the official characters, and they never change. Nobody dies. Nothing changes. You play with the official sock puppets, and you are allowed to be happy within IP allowances.

Champions' heroes could fall from grace, and they could fall hard. Anything could happen. Go ahead and make that choice; the next writer won't save you or reset anything. You may end up the villain. You will probably go out in a blaze of glory like James Cagney in White Heat. However you choose to fall from grace, there are no guardrails here, and there are no retcons. The danger is real, and one wrong power blast could vaporize a crowd of innocent bystanders.

Just one small mistake can start a downfall, and it takes a lot to walk the true path of a hero. You fall, and you fall hard. After the crowd destroys your statue, the city will tear it down in disgrace. That can't happen to a Marvel or DC character. They are "profitable IP" and can never change, and when they are sold to the next company, here we go again.

And you don't know how good a superhero game can be.

Hero System went from the garage today to my coffee table, and now it's heading to an upstairs shelf.

How Much Game Do I Need?

I got a shipping confirmation for the new Kobold Press crowdfunding book for ToV, and my 5E books are heading into the garage. I like ToV; this is the best version of 5E out there, but 5E is far too much game for me. I will keep it, but it is heading into the garage once it arrives.

I hate that feeling.

Sometimes I feel like selling all my 5E books would make me the happiest, and I will just stick with OSRIC and OSE and have just enough "fantasy game" for me. I don't need all the 5E structure; it is too much. The entire 5E industry overwrites and doesn't care one bit about efficiency, conciseness, or compactness; the 5E market is the "bigger SUV" market of gas-guzzlers and shelf-eaters.

For a "power-based game," a superhero game gives me much more. Sometimes I look at D&D 5E and compare it to something like Champions, and the latter is the better choice. Why am I messing around with games that sell me prebuilt superheroes (powers on a level track) who talk like they're at Ren Faire? The designers prebuild these builds at level 20 and then slowly hand you the powers over 20 levels. They make money by selling you new ones once you get bored of the old ones.

It is the difference between a deep-fried fish sandwich at a fast-food place versus knowing how to fish and prepare your own food. The fast food is worse for your health, more expensive, and never what you want. Yes, learning to cook takes longer and isn't as easy, but it is far healthier, more rewarding, and cheaper to feed yourself with all-natural shelf staples and healthy foods.

And nobody in a superhero game is redefining terms, controlling the language, or telling me where my powers come from. I do that. I swear some of these games care more about thought control than about shipping fun games. Give me a generic framework, please, and I will tell players what these things are. Or games like Vampire, where some factions have these powers and others have those powers. Thematically, yes, cool, okay, but in the end you are all superheroes with different shapes and themes. Vampire stuff affects you, werewolf stuff affects others, and we are done; please pick your superpowers now.

Are you a mage? Oh, then you have to deal with the mage disadvantages. A demon? Then holy stuff hurts you. Same powers, different shell. We are done here, and nobody is buying predesigned packages that drip powers out one at a time with an illusion of choice.

My Champions stuff fits in one box, and it is in the garage.

My 5E books are nearly 20 crates of the same size.

That one box does far more than the twenty.

And most of the power comes from one book.

Off the Shelf: Adventures Dark & Deep

I still love this alternate 1E game; it is huge, expanded, full of great stuff, and all still 100% 1E compatible. Adventures Dark & Deep is the ultimate "Old School Essentials: Advanced Fantasy" version of 1E, and even the monster book alone is the definitive 1E bestiary, expanded, full of fun monsters, and worth the hardcover price.

As a standalone game, few have matched its scope and depth. This is the ultimate "modern" version of 1E, and it does compare nicely to OSE Advanced Fantasy. As your "core game," you cannot go wrong here, and this is easily decades of fun. The game also has expansion books, such as the Cthulhu Mythos, and they work well as either Dark & Deep expansions or 1E expansions.

So why play a "lesser" game like OSRIC 3? For the same reason you might prefer Old School Essentials Classic Fantasy. Some do not want all the expansion content and just want to focus on the core, basic, original game. Expansions can muddy and confuse the game, creating too many race and class options for people to sift through.

You add bard and drow options, and people flock to them. Sometimes I want players to consider only the core, original, solid options, which is what the original adventures are balanced for, and I don't want a party full of special ancestries and hybrid classes. This isn't ruling them out forever, but the choice of game says what the game will be and where the focus will be.

Someone who has played a paladin or ranger will likely choose a new expansion class. Everyone wants to play a bard. Everyone wants to play an expanded ancestry.

Sometimes a more focused game delivers a better experience. The moment you open the floodgates of 1001 ancestry and class options (and subclass options), everybody can be anything, and those classic choices disappear. I am a star centaur dark reaver warlock hexblade antipaladin! Right. No.

This is why we need generic, be-anything, do-anything superhero games. If you want to be that, go play a superhero game and have anything you want. The death of the superhero gaming genre killed fantasy gaming, and the floodgates opened, letting fantasy become a superhero game with pre-canned builds companies can sell you for quarterly profits.

OSRIC 3 is a choice. Dark & Deep is an expansion, and it is also a choice. Both are entirely compatible and deserve to live on the same shelf. For me? Less is more, and I play OSRIC, just like many play OSE Classic Fantasy.

I'll migrate to Dark & Deep if I ever get tired of the original game's options. I will probably have fun here. This is just as "correct" a choice as OSRIC, and in some cases, the better one. But as I rebuild my gaming life, I want to start simple. For me, right now, simple is OSRIC.

OSRIC: Still Holding Strong

I do not regret my decision to upgrade to OSRIC. I still love OSE and my books, and I'm getting the new edition and the Demonic Grimoire soon. I'm looking forward to those books, and OSE is still a beautifully compact, portable game. In that feeling of "the tiny capturing the infinite," OSE still can't be beaten.

But OSRIC is wonderful, and one of its best features is how it limits character options. OSE has fallen to the modern design theory of "more is better," and we have all sorts of ancestries to choose from. As a result, the default world has too many ancestries, and each one means less. No orcs, no goblins, no ogres, no fox people, and no distractions. Humans alone have enough diversity; just look at our world if you want inspiration. You could add diversity to the other ancestries, too, but don't give any of them mechanical benefits. Giving every diverse ancestry option a special trinket is silly, reductive, pointless, and overdesigned.

Plus, I want my ancestries to mean something. Be an elf or a dwarf. Pick a diverse background for them. Celebrate that ancestry. It is rich, diverse, and an amazing culture to explore.

If people want special ancestries, talk to me as the GM. This isn't a rejection of all of them, and I know people will want to play as dark elves, but that option exists in 1E material, so talk to me. The world, as it is defined, will be what is in these books.

I can always pull in Unearthed Arcana for the dark elves, or any other 1E-compatible resource. Converting from OSE is another option, but you will need to set allowed classes and level limits (OSE has these; use them as a base, get the table's agreement, compare similar level limits, and adjust). You can pull in any OSE ancestry like this, so you still have choices; the default set just resets to the original 1E game's set.

I don't want the modern World of Warcraft style world, where 1001 funny-shaped player avatars run around, and the company keeps adding new ones while watering down and ignoring what they already have. It gets to a point where new MMO character options are introduced just to pump up quarterly numbers; the new option never gets proper respect or treatment in lore, and next quarter a new one comes out, the company will ignore it and shove the old one on a shelf like a toy that never gets played with. We get the same "sales mentality" in tabletop gaming, and it ruins our worlds.

Humans, elves, dwarves, and the core ancestries are amazingly diverse. There's already more than enough here. With limited choices, my stories and worlds are much better. I have focus again. My history and world-building are clearer.

But if I am pulling in OSE ancestries, why not just play OSE? I enjoy OSRIC's limited options better, and I always have my OSE books should I want something special or different. OSRIC's turn structure is superior, and phased casting gives casters real choice and balance. The fighters mean something here, especially with specialization. Rogues have real meaning with their backstabs. I have to mod and house-rule the game far less to enjoy it.

If I want a tiefling or dark elf, they are always there. But they are limited, special choices, which makes them feel special and unique. The basic books are all I want or need, and there is plenty of other 1E material out there to last me a lifetime.